1952 BMW 340 vs. 2006 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2006 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover LR3 (216 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340.
Because 2006 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 BMW 340. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 340 | 2006 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | BMW | Land Rover |
| Model | 340 | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 216 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2890 mm |
