1952 BMW 340 vs. 2008 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac DTS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 385 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 340 | 2008 Cadillac DTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 340 | DTS |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2940 mm |
