1952 BMW 340 vs. 2010 Buick Lucerne
To start off, 2010 Buick Lucerne is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 3,900 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Buick Lucerne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Buick Lucerne (227 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Buick Lucerne should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Buick Lucerne weights approximately 476 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Buick Lucerne, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2010 Buick Lucerne | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 340 | Lucerne |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1726 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1875 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2936 mm |