1952 BMW 340 vs. 2010 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac DTS is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 340. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 340 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac DTS (292 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1952 BMW 340. (53 HP @ 3750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 340. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 568 kg more than 1952 BMW 340. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 BMW 340 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 340. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 340 | 2010 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 340 | DTS |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 3750 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1818 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5273 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2936 mm |