1952 BMW 501 vs. 1969 Rover 2000
To start off, 1969 Rover 2000 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 1,976 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Rover 2000 (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1952 BMW 501. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Rover 2000 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1952 BMW 501. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 501 | 1969 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | BMW | Rover |
| Model | 501 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 85.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 85.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2640 mm |
