1952 BMW 501 vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1952 BMW 501. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1952 BMW 501. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 501 | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 501 | CJ7 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2380 mm |