1952 BMW 501 vs. 1989 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 4,295 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro (285 HP) has 213 more horse power than 1952 BMW 501. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 501.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 501 | 1989 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 501 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 285 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 11.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2650 mm |
