1952 BMW 501 vs. 1990 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1990 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford Thunderbird (139 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1952 BMW 501. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 325 kg more than 1952 BMW 501. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 501 | 1990 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 501 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 96.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2880 mm |