1952 BMW 501 vs. 1990 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1990 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1952 BMW 501. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 501 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1990 Plymouth Sundance.
Because 1952 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 501 | 1990 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | BMW | Plymouth |
| Model | 501 | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2470 mm |
