1952 BMW 501 vs. 1991 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1991 Ford Tempo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,305 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Tempo (97 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1952 BMW 501. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 501 weights approximately 135 kg more than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Because 1952 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 501 | 1991 Ford Tempo | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 501 | Tempo |
Year Released | 1952 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2305 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2540 mm |