1952 BMW 501 vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,293 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C (189 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1952 BMW 501. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 215 kg more than 1952 BMW 501. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 501 | 2000 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | BMW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 501 | C |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2840 mm |