1952 BMW 501 vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1952 BMW 501. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 25 kg more than 1952 BMW 501. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 501 | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | BMW | Opel |
Model | 501 | Omega |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5666 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1310 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2620 mm |