1952 BMW 501 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (189 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1952 BMW 501. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 501. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 BMW 501 weights approximately 166 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Because 1952 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 501 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 501 | Celica |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.8:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1285 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2610 mm |