1952 BMW 501 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1952 BMW 501. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 501.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 BMW 501 | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 501 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2210 mm |
