1952 BMW 501 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1952 BMW 501. (72 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 BMW 501.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 501 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 501 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 84.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3010 mm |