1952 BMW 501 vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 BMW 501 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 BMW 501 (72 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 BMW 501 should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Because 1952 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 BMW 501 | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 501 | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2480 mm |