1952 Bristol 401 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1958 Cadillac 62 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1952 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1952 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 870 kg more than 1952 Bristol 401. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Bristol 401 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 401 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3300 mm |
