1952 Bristol 401 vs. 1961 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1961 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1952 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1952 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 860 kg more than 1952 Bristol 401. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Bristol 401 | 1961 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
| Model | 401 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3300 mm |
