1952 Bristol 401 vs. 1961 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1961 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1952 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1952 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 650 kg more than 1952 Bristol 401. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Bristol 401 | 1961 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 401 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 6638 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 339 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2880 mm |
