1952 Bristol 401 vs. 1968 Cadillac Calais
To start off, 1968 Cadillac Calais is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Calais (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1952 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Calais should accelerate faster than 1952 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Calais weights approximately 880 kg more than 1952 Bristol 401. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Cadillac Calais (711 Nm) has 566 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Bristol 401. (145 Nm). This means 1968 Cadillac Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Bristol 401.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bristol 401 | 1968 Cadillac Calais | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | 401 | Calais |
Year Released | 1952 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 7734 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 711 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 103.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 3300 mm |