1952 Bristol 401 vs. 1980 Zastava 132
To start off, 1980 Zastava 132 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Bristol 401 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1952 Bristol 401. (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 1952 Bristol 401. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Bristol 401 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1980 Zastava 132.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Bristol 401 (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Bristol 401 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bristol 401 | 1980 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Bristol | Zastava |
Model | 401 | 132 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2560 mm |