1952 Bristol 401 vs. 2010 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Doblo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bristol 401. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bristol 401 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Bristol 401 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Bristol 401 (72 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Doblo. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Bristol 401 should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Doblo.
Because 1952 Bristol 401 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Bristol 401. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Fiat Doblo (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Bristol 401. (145 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Fiat Doblo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Bristol 401.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bristol 401 | 2010 Fiat Doblo | |
Make | Bristol | Fiat |
Model | 401 | Doblo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2755 mm |