1952 Bugatti Type 101 vs. 1998 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 3,349 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro (160 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Bugatti Type 101 weights approximately 27 kg more than 1998 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Bugatti Type 101 | 1998 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Bugatti | Chevrolet |
| Model | Type 101 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3257 cc | 3349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1413 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2450 mm |
