1952 Bugatti Type 101 vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 3,563 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (252 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 235 kg more than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bugatti Type 101 | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Bugatti | Cadillac |
Model | Type 101 | CTS |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3257 cc | 3563 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1675 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2890 mm |