1952 Bugatti Type 101 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 515 kg more than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bugatti Type 101 | 2004 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Bugatti | Chevrolet |
Model | Type 101 | Astro |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3257 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1955 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2630 mm |