1952 Bugatti Type 101 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 3,257 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Bugatti Type 101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Bugatti Type 101 (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (83 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Bugatti Type 101 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1952 Bugatti Type 101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Bugatti Type 101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bugatti Type 101 | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Bugatti | Volkswagen |
Model | Type 101 | Polo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3257 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2470 mm |