1952 Bugatti Type 101 vs. 2008 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 3,257 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Bugatti Type 101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Bugatti Type 101 (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Bugatti Type 101 should accelerate faster than 2008 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Bugatti Type 101 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2008 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Bugatti Type 101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Bugatti Type 101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bugatti Type 101 | 2008 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Bugatti | Fiat |
Model | Type 101 | Bravo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3257 cc | 1908 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1395 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2610 mm |