1952 Bugatti Type 101 vs. 2008 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2008 Jeep Compass is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 3,257 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Bugatti Type 101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Compass weights approximately 389 kg more than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Bugatti Type 101. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bugatti Type 101 | 2008 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Bugatti | Jeep |
Model | Type 101 | Compass |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3257 cc | 2358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1829 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2640 mm |