1952 Bugatti Type 101 vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bugatti Type 101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bugatti Type 101 would be higher. At 3,257 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Bugatti Type 101 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Bugatti Type 101 (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2010 Smart ForTwo. (70 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Bugatti Type 101 should accelerate faster than 2010 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Bugatti Type 101 weights approximately 620 kg more than 2010 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Bugatti Type 101 | 2010 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Bugatti | Smart |
Model | Type 101 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3257 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 820 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 1867 mm |