1952 Bugatti Type 73 vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Bugatti Type 73. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Bugatti Type 73 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Bugatti Type 73 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Bugatti Type 73. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Bugatti Type 73 | 2003 MG ZT | |
| Make | Bugatti | MG |
| Model | Type 73 | ZT |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1463 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
