1952 Buick 40 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1964 Cadillac 62 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1952 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Buick 40 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | 40 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 2030 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3300 mm |
