1952 Buick 40 vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1967 Nissan Cedric is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Buick 40 (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Buick | Nissan |
Model | 40 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1952 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2700 mm |