1952 Buick 40 vs. 1982 Renault 5
To start off, 1982 Renault 5 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Renault 5 (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Renault 5 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 665 kg more than 1982 Renault 5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 5. (221 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 1982 Renault 5 | |
Make | Buick | Renault |
Model | 40 | 5 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2490 mm |