1952 Buick 40 vs. 1984 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 485 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 1984 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | 40 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1952 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2580 mm |