1952 Buick 40 vs. 1989 Rover 216
To start off, 1989 Rover 216 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Buick 40 (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1989 Rover 216. (114 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1989 Rover 216. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1989 Rover 216. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Rover 216, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Rover 216. (141 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Rover 216.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 1989 Rover 216 | |
Make | Buick | Rover |
Model | 40 | 216 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2550 mm |