1952 Buick 40 vs. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,296 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (160 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 280 kg more than 1952 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Blazer (345 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 1996 Chevrolet Blazer | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | 40 | Blazer |
Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 345 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2730 mm |