1952 Buick 40 vs. 1996 Italdesign Formula 4
To start off, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 (147 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Formula 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4. (187 Nm). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Italdesign Formula 4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Buick 40 | 1996 Italdesign Formula 4 | |
| Make | Buick | Italdesign |
| Model | 40 | Formula 4 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1998 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 147 HP |
| Torque | 292 Nm | 187 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2550 mm |
