1952 Buick 40 vs. 1997 Renault Clio
To start off, 1997 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Buick 40 (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1997 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1997 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1997 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Clio. (85 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 1997 Renault Clio | |
Make | Buick | Renault |
Model | 40 | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 75.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 64.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2550 mm |