1952 Buick 40 vs. 1997 Volvo S70
To start off, 1997 Volvo S70 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Volvo S70 (124 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Volvo S70 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Volvo S70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Volvo S70. (170 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Volvo S70.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 1997 Volvo S70 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | 40 | S70 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2670 mm |