1952 Buick 40 vs. 1998 Honda Integra
To start off, 1998 Honda Integra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Honda Integra (197 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 436 kg more than 1998 Honda Integra.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 1998 Honda Integra | |
Make | Buick | Honda |
Model | 40 | Integra |
Year Released | 1952 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1199 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2570 mm |