1952 Buick 40 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Corvette

To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,970 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Corvette (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 115 kg more than 1952 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Corvette (543 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 Chevrolet Corvette will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.

Compare all specifications: