1952 Buick 40 vs. 2001 Saturn L
To start off, 2001 Saturn L is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Saturn L, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 2001 Saturn L | |
Make | Buick | Saturn |
Model | 40 | L |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2962 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |