1952 Buick 40 vs. 2001 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2001 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Sequoia (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 21 kg more than 2001 Toyota Sequoia.
Because 2001 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Sequoia (430 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 2001 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Buick | Toyota |
Model | 40 | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 430 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1614 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3010 mm |