1952 Buick 40 vs. 2001 TVR Tuscan
To start off, 2001 TVR Tuscan is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 TVR Tuscan (390 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 TVR Tuscan should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 535 kg more than 2001 TVR Tuscan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 TVR Tuscan (420 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 TVR Tuscan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 2001 TVR Tuscan | |
Make | Buick | TVR |
Model | 40 | Tuscan |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2370 mm |