1952 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Citroen C3

To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 118 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 502 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3.

Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Buick 40 2002 Citroen C3
Make Buick Citroen
Model 40 C3
Year Released 1952 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4066 cc 1586 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 292 Nm 147 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.6 mm 78.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 104.8 mm 82 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1133 kg
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1670 mm
Wheelbase Size 3090 mm 2470 mm