1952 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Ford F-150
To start off, 2003 Ford F-150 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford F-150 (202 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford F-150 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1952 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford F-150 (338 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 2003 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | F-150 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 292 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3050 mm |