1952 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Mahindra Scorpio
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Scorpio is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Buick 40 (118 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Scorpio. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Scorpio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Scorpio weights approximately 275 kg more than 1952 Buick 40.
Because 2003 Mahindra Scorpio is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Scorpio will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra Scorpio. (260 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra Scorpio.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Buick 40 | 2003 Mahindra Scorpio | |
Make | Buick | Mahindra |
Model | 40 | Scorpio |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4066 cc | 2609 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 292 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1910 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2690 mm |