1952 Buick 40 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (140 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 361 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier.

Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier. (203 Nm). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier.

Compare all specifications: