1952 Buick 40 vs. 2004 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1952 Buick 40. (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1952 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 123 kg more than 1952 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (525 Nm) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Buick 40. (292 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Buick 40.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Buick 40 2004 Jaguar XK
Make Buick Jaguar
Model 40 XK
Year Released 1952 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4066 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 292 Nm 525 Nm
Engine Bore Size 78.6 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 104.8 mm 90 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1635 kg 1758 kg
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 3090 mm 2590 mm