1952 Buick 40 vs. 2005 Citroen Xsara

To start off, 2005 Citroen Xsara is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Buick 40 (118 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Buick 40 weights approximately 645 kg more than 2005 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Buick 40 (292 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen Xsara. (110 Nm). This means 1952 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications: